VIRTUAL LABORATORY: TELEVISION PRINCIPLES

Scanning • Resolution • Bandwidth

EEEN 462 — Analog Communication 4th Year, B.Sc. Electrical & Electronic Engineering Egerton University

Laboratory Objectives

By the end of this virtual laboratory session, the student should be able to:

Prerequisites: ECE 523E concepts — electromagnetic wave propagation, antenna radiation patterns, and frequency-spectrum fundamentals. A basic knowledge of analogue signal processing is assumed.

General Theory

1. The Television Problem

Television converts a two-dimensional, time-varying optical scene into an electrical signal suitable for transmission over a channel, and reconstructs it at the receiver. Since a single communication channel can only carry a one-dimensional function of time, the scene must be sampled in an orderly, repetitive manner. This sampling process is called scanning: a spot of light or electrons traverses the image in a fixed pattern called a raster, and the brightness of each sampled point is converted into a proportional voltage by a camera sensor (photodiode / CCD / CMOS).

2. Scanning

In the standard raster pattern the spot moves from left to right along a line, then rapidly returns to the left (the horizontal retrace) while stepping down to the next line. When the last line is completed the spot returns to the top (the vertical retrace) and the pattern repeats. Each complete pattern of lines is a frame.

fv = fframe = ffield / 2 Frame rate = field rate ÷ 2 (interlaced systems)

Typical standards: CCIR System B/G (Kenya/Uganda/Europe) — 625 lines, 50 fields/s, 25 frames/s, video bandwidth 5 MHz, channel spacing 8 MHz, VHF/UHF bands III–V. NTSC (USA/Japan) — 525 lines, 60 fields/s, 30 frames/s, 4.2 MHz video bandwidth, 6 MHz channels.

3. Resolution

Resolution is the ability of the TV system to reproduce fine detail, measured in TV lines or equivalently as a bandwidth.

Nh = 2 × B × Th(active) B = video bandwidth (Hz); Th(active) = active line time (s)

The aspect ratio (A = width/height, 4/3 in conventional TV, 16/9 in HDTV) links the two: to make picture elements square, the system must pass Nv × A brightness changes per picture height, i.e. per frame time.

4. Video (Picture) Bandwidth

Consider the worst-case picture: alternating black-and-white elements as fine as the resolution limit. If there are Nv elements vertically and A·Nv horizontally, each frame contains Nv × A × Nv transitions per second. Each transition requires half a cycle of the highest transmitted frequency (maximum rate = 2B transitions/s). Accounting for the fact that only a fraction of each line/field is active (active ratio α ≈ 0.84 of lines, retrace losses), the standard result is:

B = ½ × K × α × N2 × fframe × A TV video bandwidth: K ≈ 0.7 (Kell), α ≈ 0.84 (active ratio), N = total lines, fframe = frames/s, A = aspect ratio

Worked check (CCIR 625-line system): B = 0.5 × 0.7 × 0.84 × 6252 × 25 × 1.33 ≈ 4.8 MHz (standardised at 5 MHz). The full channel is wider (8 MHz) because it must additionally carry the FM sound carrier and vestigial-sideband guard bands — a key link to the antenna/channel-planning topics of ECE 523E.

5. Relevance to Antennas & Radiowave Propagation

Experiment 1: Raster Scanning (Progressive vs Interlaced)

Aim: To demonstrate progressive and interlaced raster scanning and to measure line and field timing parameters.

Apparatus (virtual): Raster-scan simulator, dual-trace timing display, number-of-lines selector, field/frame counter.

Theory Recap

In the simulator below, a bright spot traces the raster. A faint "phosphor persistence" trace shows the path history so that the full raster is visible while the beam moves. A line trace shows the instantaneous scanning spot amplitude (brightness vs. time) as would be seen at the output of a camera tube or the input of a picture tube.

Procedure

  1. Set the number of scan lines N = 8 (small, so the raster is easy to see), choose Progressive mode, and press Start Scan.
  2. Observe the spot moving left-to-right (active trace), the rapid return during horizontal retrace, and the return to the top during vertical retrace.
  3. Count the number of lines in one frame; confirm that in progressive mode all 8 lines are traced consecutively in one sweep. Record the time for one frame (frame period).
  4. Switch to Interlaced mode and restart. Observe that the odd field (lines 1, 3, 5, 7) is traced first, followed by the even field (lines 2, 4, 6, 8).
  5. Using the timing readouts, verify that the field rate = 2 × frame rate, i.e. each field takes half a frame.
  6. Increase N to 16 and 32 and repeat. Note how the raster appears more continuous; relate this to real TV (625 lines, interlaced, 50 fields/s → 25 frames/s).
  7. Sketch one frame of each raster type in your report and annotate the active trace, both retrace intervals, and the field structure.

▶ Simulation 1: Raster Scanner

ModeInterlaced
Frame count0
Field count0
Current fieldOdd
Lines traced0 / 16
Vertical retraceNo

Observations (Record in Your Report)

N (lines)ModeLines per fieldFrame period (arb. units)Field period (arb. units)Observed raster appearance
8Progressive—
8Interlaced
16Interlaced
32Interlaced

Experiment 2: Picture Resolution (Vertical & Horizontal)

Aim: To investigate how the number of scanning lines and the video bandwidth limit picture resolution, and to verify the role of the Kell factor.

Apparatus (virtual): Test-pattern generator (fine wedge + stripes), variable-line raster sampler, resolution readout.

Theory Recap

The test pattern contains vertical bars whose spacing decreases toward the right (like a TV wedge). If the raster has N lines, only picture features larger than the line spacing can be reproduced vertically. Horizontally, the number of brightness alternations per line is limited by the bandwidth slider: as the bandwidth is reduced, fine detail smears into grey. The vertical resolution counter applies the Kell factor: Nv = K·Nvisible.

Procedure

  1. Set scan lines = 64 and bandwidth = 100% (full detail). Run the sampler and observe that all bars, including the finest, are reproduced.
  2. Reduce the scan lines to 32, then 16. Note the finest bar group that still appears as separate black/white stripes — this is the effective vertical resolution. Compare it with K·N.
  3. Restore N = 64. Reduce bandwidth in steps (100 → 50 → 25 → 12%). Observe the horizontal smearing of fine bars while coarse bars remain sharp.
  4. At each bandwidth setting record: (a) finest vertical-bar group resolved, (b) the computed horizontal TV lines shown by the simulator, (c) whether vertical or horizontal resolution limits first.
  5. Explain in your report why reducing N affects vertical detail while reducing bandwidth affects horizontal detail, and why Nv < N (Kell factor: an element lying between two scan lines is illuminated by both and averaged).

▶ Simulation 2: Resolution Test Pattern Sampler

Vertical res. Nv = K·N45 TV lines
Horizontal res.240 TV lines
Limiting factor—
Square-pixel Nh = Nv×A60

Top: ideal test pattern. Bottom: what the TV raster actually reproduces, sampled at N lines and low-pass filtered by the bandwidth setting.

Observations

N (lines)Bandwidth (%)Nv = K·NNh (sim.)Finest bar group resolved?Limiting factor
64100
32100
16100
6450
6425
6412

Experiment 3: Video Bandwidth of a Television Signal

Aim: To derive the video bandwidth from the system parameters (lines, frame rate, aspect ratio) and to verify it against the standard 625-line and 525-line TV systems.

Apparatus (virtual): TV standards calculator, waveform display with selectable bandwidth limiting, spectrum sketch panel.

Theory Recap

Rearranging the theory formula, a TV system transmitting N lines per frame at fframe frames/s with aspect ratio A and Kell factor K requires video bandwidth B = 0.5·K·α·N2·fframe·A. The waveform panel shows the worst-case video signal (alternating black/white picture elements at the resolution limit) and the effect of truncating its spectrum at the computed B. The spectrum sketch shows the picture-signal band extending from DC to B, with the sound carrier and vestigial sideband of a real 8 MHz TV channel marked for reference.

Procedure

  1. Load the CCIR 625-line preset. Record N = 625, fframe = 25 Hz, A = 4/3, K = 0.7, α = 0.84. Compute fh = N·fframe (line frequency) and fv (field rate = 2·fframe).
  2. Read the computed video bandwidth and compare with the standard value of 5 MHz. Comment on the small difference (guard margins, rounded active-line assumptions).
  3. Repeat with the NTSC 525-line preset (30 frames/s) and verify B ≈ 4.2 MHz.
  4. Vary one parameter at a time (N, fframe, A) from the 625-line baseline and record B each time. Confirm from your table that B is proportional to N2 — doubling the lines quadruples the bandwidth. Explain why HDTV (1080+ lines) needed digital compression (MPEG) to fit terrestrial channels.
  5. In the waveform display, observe that limiting the bandwidth to B removes the higher harmonics of the finest picture elements — the square edges round off — while picture elements larger than the resolution limit pass unaffected.
  6. Sketch the channel occupancy (DC–5 MHz picture, vestigial lower sideband, FM sound carrier at +6 MHz) and relate the 8 MHz channel to VHF/UHF frequency planning in Kenya (antenna topics from ECE 523E).

▶ Simulation 3: Bandwidth Calculator & Waveform

Video bandwidth B4.80 MHz
Line frequency fh15.63 kHz
Field rate fv50 Hz
Resolution limit elem.—

Waveform: worst-case video signal at the resolution limit. The shaded region shows the spectrum passed (0 to B). Grey trace = unlimited signal.

Observations

System / variationNfframe (Hz)AKB computed (MHz)Standard B (MHz)
CCIR 625 (baseline)625254:30.705.0
NTSC 525525304:30.704.2
625-line, N doubled (1250)1250254:30.70—
625-line, fframe doubled (50)625504:30.70—
625-line, 16:96252516:90.70—
Your own variation

Guidelines for Writing the Laboratory Report

Reports must be typed, submitted as PDF, and follow the MMUST School of Engineering format. Suggested length: 6–10 pages (excluding appendices). Use the structure below.

1. Title PageCourse code & title (ECE 523E — Antenna & Radiowave Propagation), experiment title (Television Principles), your name, registration number, group number, date of experiment, date of submission, lecturer's name.
2. AbstractA single paragraph (100–150 words) summarising objectives, key methods, principal results (e.g. computed B for the 625-line system), and conclusions.
3. ObjectivesList the objectives as given in this manual, rephrased where appropriate.
4. TheoryExplain scanning (progressive & interlaced), vertical/horizontal resolution, the Kell factor, and the derivation of B = 0.5KαN²fframeA. Include your own clearly-labelled diagrams of the raster and the TV channel spectrum. Cite lecture notes or a textbook.
5. ProcedureDescribe what you actually did, in your own words and in the past tense. Reference each simulator and setting (e.g. "Interlaced mode, N = 16 lines, maximum scan speed"). Include screenshots of each simulation at meaningful settings.
6. Results & AnalysisPresent the completed observation tables from Experiments 1–3. Show all sample calculations (bandwidth computation, line frequency, Kell-adjusted resolution). Plot any trends (e.g. B vs N, confirming the N² law). Compare simulated values with theoretical/standard values and compute the percentage error, stating its likely cause.
7. DiscussionAnswer the discussion questions: Why is interlacing used? Why does Nv < N? What physical justification does the Kell factor have? How does video bandwidth map to the 8 MHz VHF/UHF channel, and what does this imply for TV receiving-antenna bandwidth (link to ECE 523E antenna topics)?
8. ConclusionConcise statements of what was verified, in the same order as the objectives. No new material here.
9. ReferencesNumbered list in IEEE style, e.g. [1] S. O. Kasap, Optoelectronics and Photonics; [2] A. B. Carlson & P. Crilly, Communication Systems; lecture notes for ECE 523E.
10. AppendixRaw screenshots, additional parameter sweeps, and any code or worksheets used.

Marking Guide (Indicative)

ComponentMarks
Theory understanding & quality of diagrams20%
Procedure description & evidence of simulation runs15%
Results completeness, calculations & error analysis30%
Discussion & ECE 523E linkage (antennas/propagation)20%
Presentation, structure & referencing15%
Academic integrity: All plots, screenshots and calculations must come from your own simulation runs. Plagiarised or shared results attract penalties per MMUST regulations.

References

  1. Carlson, A. B., & Crilly, P. (2009). Communication Systems: An Introduction to Signals and Noise in Electrical Communication (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. (TV bandwidth derivation, Chapter on pulse/analogue transmission.)
  2. Gulati, R. R. (2012). Modern Television Practice: Transmission, Reception and Applications. New Age International. (625-line CCIR scanning standards.)
  3. Whitaker, J. C., & Benson, K. B. (Eds.). (2003). Standard Handbook of Video and Television Engineering (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. (Resolution, Kell factor, bandwidth.)
  4. MMUST Department of Electrical & Communication Engineering (2026). ECE 523E: Antenna & Radiowave Propagation Lecture Notes. Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology.
  5. ITU-R Recommendation BT.470-7 (2005). Conventional Television Systems. International Telecommunication Union. (System B/G 625-line parameters used in Kenya.)